Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: No Synonyms
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| VU - Vulnerable, D2 (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: (Not specified)
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): Braun, K.
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Aeschynomene stipitata has been found in one locality in
recent years, the original collection of this species dates back to
1914, with the locality uncertain. With only one confirmed record
of this species, it is not possible to determine population trends, but
as occurs in an area where there is a threat from both overgrazing and
alien invasive plants. More fieldwork might find this species in
additional localities. Its extremely limited distribution
qualifies this species for a Vulnerable listing.
Date last seen: 2017
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This species was described from a specimen collected by F A Rogers in 1914, with the locality being Mbabane, Swaziland, the type being held by Kew. Material from this same collection is in the Meise Botanic Garden herbarium, but this one has Transvaal as the locality. This species was found in Eswatini in the Shewula area in the Lubombos in 2017. It is likely that the locality information for the type specimen may be incorrect, so for assessment purposes, only the more recent locality information was considered.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 4 | This is based on one observation in 2017, the locality information for the type specimen from 1914 being questionable. The estimated area of occupancy was calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. |
Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO): (Not specified)
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | true | This is based on one observation in 2017, the locality information for the type specimen from 1914 being questionable. The estimated extent of occurrence calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011) was 0 km2, less than the area of occupancy, so the higher figure has been used here. |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | This species has only been observed once in recent years. |
Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO): (Not specified)
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 1 | This is based on one observation in 2017, the locality information for the type specimen from 1914 being questionable. This location is potentially threatened by both overgrazing and alien invasive plants. |
| Continuing decline in number of locations | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | This species has only been observed on one occasion in recent years. |
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations: (Not specified)
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Yes | This is based on one observation in 2017, the locality information for the type specimen from 1914 being questionable. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 100
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 100
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
No population surveys have been carried out for this species. The 2017 observation indicated that this species was rare within the area surveyed.
Current Population Trend: Unknown
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
The observation of this species in 2017 recorded this species in an alluvial floodplain area, the vegetation community being Phoenix reclinata - Vitex harveyana - Phyllanthus reticulatus, forming riparian scrub-thicket. The vegetation type as per the Southern African vegetation map is Southern Lebombo Bushveld (SVI16) (Mucina et. al. 2018).
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2. Savanna -> Savanna - Moist | - | Suitable | - |
Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? (Not specified)
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: Terrestrial
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
This species was observed within the Shewula community conservation area, which is subject to high levels of grazing by cattle, and there is also a threat from alien invasive plants.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Livestock farming & ranching -> Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing | Whole (>90%) | Causing/Could cause fluctuations |
| 8.1.1. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> Unspecified species | Ongoing | Whole (>90%) | Slow, Significant Declines |
The locality where this species was observed in 2017 falls with in the Shewula community conservation area, although this only provides limited protection for the species.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| Unknown | - |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| Yes | This species was observed within the Shewula community conservation area. However, the area is currently still subjected to heavy grazing, and there is an ongoing threat from alien invasive plants, so the degree of protection is limited. |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 91-100 | Currently, the confirmed species distribution is limited to only one locality, falling within the Shewula community conservation area. |
Area based regional management plan: (Not specified)
| Invasive species control or prevention | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 2.1. Land/water management -> Site/area management | Support for the Shewula Community conservation area to help with control of both grazing levels and alien invasive plants would increase the potential survival of this plant. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | Collection of material for ex-situ conservation would increase the potential for survival of this species. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | Very little is currently known about this species, with only one record in recent years. Research is needed into the population sizes and trends, as well as fieldwork to determine if this species is found in additional localities. |
| 1.3. Research -> Life history & ecology | There is currently no information on the life history and ecology of this species. Such information would aid with determination of possible conservation actions for this plant. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J, Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.