Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: Salpinctium hirsutum T.J.Edwards
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| VU - Vulnerable, B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: 2023-01-26
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): Braun, K.
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Asystasia hirsuta has a restricted distribution, with an estimated extent of occurrence of 6,923.895 km2 and an area of occupancy of 24 km2.
The areas where this species has been found are subjected to the threat
of habitat destruction by ongoing livestock grazing, and in some parts
of its range, to urban development. Based on this, it has been
assessed as Vulnerable, under Criteria B1 and B2.
Date last seen: 2021
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This species has been recorded from five widely spread localities within Eswatini, four highveld and one in the Lubombo mountains. There is also a record from South Africa, near Nelspruit, making this species a near endemic for Eswatini.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 24 | This species has been recorded from six records. The estimated area of occupancy was calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. |
| Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | There is no information on any trends for this species. |
| Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no information on any trends for this species. |
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 6923.90 | true | This species has been recorded from six localities, five from Eswatini and one from South Africa. The estimated extent of occurrence was calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | There is no information on any trends for this species. |
| Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no information on any trends for this species. |
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 6 | This species has been recorded from six localities, five from Eswatini and one from South Africa. These are considered to form 6 separate locations. |
| Continuing decline in number of locations | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | There is no information on any trends for this species. |
| Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no information on any trends for this species. |
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | Two of the records for this species are over fifty years old, and presence of this species has not been confirmed at these localities, so it is possible that the plant no longer occurs in these areas. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 725
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 1330
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
| South Africa -> Mpumalanga | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
No population surveys have been carried out for this species. For the purposes of this assessment, the localities of older records have been included, as, at the time of this assessment, there is no evidence to indicate that the plant no longer exists in these areas. Where this species has been observed recently, it was uncommon, with two individuals observed in the area visited.
Current Population Trend: Unknown
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
This species has been observed in vegetation type KaNgwane Montane Grassland (Gm16) in the Eswatini highveld, and in vegetation type Southern Lebombo Bushveld (SVI16) in the Lubombo Mountains. In South Africa, based on a rough estimate of the locality, it was recorded from Barberton Serpentine Sourveld (SVI13) (Mucina et. al. 2018).
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2. Savanna -> Savanna - Moist | - | Suitable | - |
| 4.7. Grassland -> Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude | - | Suitable | - |
| Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | - | The recent observations of this species in the Eswatini highveld were in an area subject to heavy grazing and adjacent to expanding urban development. |
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: Terrestrial
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
The recent observations of this species in the Eswatini highveld were in an area subject to heavy grazing and adjacent to expanding urban development. This also applies to the earlier record from the same general area, near the Ngwenya/Oshoek border.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1. Residential & commercial development -> Housing & urban areas | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| 2.3.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Livestock farming & ranching -> Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing | Unknown | Unknown |
None of the records for this species have been from within an existing conservation area.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 0 | - |
| Area based regional management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
Invasive species control or prevention: (Not specified)
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Land/water protection -> Resource & habitat protection | Many of the grassland areas in Eswatini are subject to heavy grazing and burning, so there is a need for conservation measures to protect this habitat. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | There is currently no ex-situ conservation for this species, collection of material for long term storage would ensure the survival of this plant if it is lost from its natural habitats. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | There is currently no information available on population size or trends for this species, and more fieldwork is required to determine if this plant occurs at more locations. |
| 1.3. Research -> Life history & ecology | Very little is known about the life history and ecology of this species. |
| 3.4. Monitoring -> Habitat trends | There is the potential for loss of populations of this species due to land use practices or changes, monitoring of the status of the habitat would provide information in this regard. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J and Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.