Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: No Synonyms
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| VU - Vulnerable, B1ab(i,ii,iii)+2ab(i,ii,iii) (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: 2023-01-27
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): Braun, K.
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Cephalaria foliosa has a restricted distribution, with an estimated extent of occurrence of 2,340.568 km2 and an area of occupancy of 28 km2.
There is an ongoing threat of habitat degradation or destruction from
overgrazing by livestock. Based on this, it has been assessed as
Vulnerable, under Criteria B1 and B2.
Date last seen: 2006
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This species is known from the Eswatini highveld as well as from to localities in South Africa in northern KwaZulu Natal.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 28 | The estimated area of occupancy has been based on records being from seven localities, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. |
| Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | It is possible that this species is declining due to habitat degradation, with overgrazing likely to be having an impact on unprotected wetland systems in the Eswatini highveld. |
| Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | - |
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 2340.568 | true | The estimated extent of occurrence has been based on records being from seven localities, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | It is possible that this species is declining due to habitat degradation, with overgrazing likely to be having an impact on unprotected wetland systems in the Eswatini highveld. |
| Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | - |
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 7 | This plant has been recorded from 7 localities. These localities are well separated geographically, and are considered to form 7 locations. |
| Continuing decline in number of locations | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | The continued presence of this species has not been confirmed for a number of years, the most recent record from Eswatini being from 1976. |
| Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | - |
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| No | The estimated area of occupancy for this species based on records from seven localities is 28 km2. This might be an overestimate due to habitat requirements for this species. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 995
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 1580
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
| South Africa -> KwaZulu-Natal | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
The information on the population for this species is based on nine records from seven localities. No detailed population surveys have been carried out.
Current Population Trend: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
This species is a herbaceous perennial found growing socially in highveld swamps and near streams. The vegetation type of the Eswatini records is KaNgwane Montane Grassland (Gm16), and the South African records in Paulpietersburg in Moist Grassland (Gm15) and Northern Zululand Mistbelt Grassland (Gs1) (Mucina et. al. 2018).
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.7. Grassland -> Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude | - | Suitable | Yes |
| 5.4. Wetlands (inland) -> Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands | - | Suitable | Yes |
| Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | It is possible that this species is declining due to habitat degradation, with overgrazing likely to be having an impact on unprotected wetland systems in the Eswatini highveld. |
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: Terrestrial
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
It is possible that this species is declining due to habitat degradation, with overgrazing likely to be having an impact on unprotected wetland systems in the Eswatini highveld.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Livestock farming & ranching -> Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines |
This species is yet to be recorded from within a protected area.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 0 | - |
| Area based regional management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Invasive species control or prevention | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Land/water protection -> Resource & habitat protection | There is a need for conservation of highveld vlei systems, most of these within Eswatini currently being subjected to heavy grazing. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | No material has yet been collected of this species for ex-situ conservation. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | There is a need for fieldwork to determine the extent of the population and its trends. |
| 1.3. Research -> Life history & ecology | More information on this plant's life history and ecology would assist with conservation planning. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J and Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.