Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: No Synonyms
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| EN - Endangered, B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: 2023-01-27
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): Braun, K.
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Cephalara petiolata has a restricted distribution and there are very
few records of this species. The estimated extent of occurrence
was calculated to be 1,846.856 km2 with an area of occupancy of 12 km2.
However, one of the records needs the identification to be confirmed,
so both the extent of occurrence and area of occupancy could be
considerably smaller. There is an ongoing threat of habitat
degradation or destruction due to overgrazing by livestock. Based on
this, it has been assessed as Endangered, under Criteria B1 and
B2.
Date last seen: 2009
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This species is known from three localities, one in the Eswatini highveld, one in Songimvelo and one in the Wakkerstroom area.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 12 | The estimated area of occupancy is based on records from three localities, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. |
| Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | It is not known whether there is a decline in area of occupancy. |
| Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | It is not known if there are any extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy. |
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 1846.865 | true | The estimated extent of occurrence is based on records from three localities, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | It is unknown whether there is any continuing decline in extent of occurrence. |
| Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | It is unknown whether there are any extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence. |
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 3 | Records for this species are from three widely separated localities, so they are considered to be separate locations. |
| Continuing decline in number of locations | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | It is unknown whether there is any continuing decline in number of locations. |
| Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | It is unknown whether there are any extreme fluctuations in number of locations. |
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Yes | The known records for this species are from three locations, the area of occupancy being estimated at 12 km2. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 1390
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 1997
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
| South Africa -> Mpumalanga | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
This species is known from four records, from Eswatini and two localities in South Africa. No detailed population surveys have been conducted.
Current Population Trend: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
In Eswatini, this plant was recorded from swamps, and the Wakkerstroom area record from a temporarily inudated seepage area. It would appear that this species requires moist areas in grassland. The vegetation types for the known localities are KaNgwane Montane Grassland (Gm16), Wakkerstroom Montane Grassland (Gm14) and Barberton Serpentine Sourveld (SVI13) (Mucina et. al. 2018).
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.4. Wetlands (inland) -> Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands | - | Suitable | Yes |
| Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | Many of the small wetland systems in the highveld grassland are subject to ongoing pressure from heavy grazing. |
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: Terrestrial
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
It would appear that this species requires highveld vleis or seepage areas, and many of these are under pressure from ongoing heavy grazing.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Livestock farming & ranching -> Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines |
This species has been recorded from within Songimvelo Game Reserve, although the identity of this record requires confirmation.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| Yes, over part of range | The range of this species includes Songimvelo Game Reserve. The Eswatini records are from the Forbes Reef area, so it is possible that this species might also be found in Malolotja Nature Reserve. |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| Yes | Ths species has been recorded from Songimvelo Game Reserve. The Eswatini records are from the Forbes Reef area, so it is possible that this species might also be found in Malolotja Nature Reserve. |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 31-40 | Of the three known locations for this species, one falls within a protected area. |
Area based regional management plan: (Not specified)
| Invasive species control or prevention | Note |
|---|---|
| Unknown | - |
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Land/water protection -> Resource & habitat protection | There is need for conservation of the highveld wetland habitat where this species has been found. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | No material has yet been collected for ex-situ conservation of this species. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | There is a need for fieldwork to obtain more information on the population size, distribution and trends for this species. |
| 1.3. Research -> Life history & ecology | More information is required on the life history and ecology of this species for conservation planning purposes. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J and Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.