Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: No Synonyms
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| EN - Endangered, B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: 2023-01-29
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): Braun, K.
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Eriosema rufescens has a very limited distribution and very few known localities, with an estimated extent of occurrence of 3,462.102 km2 and area of occupancy of 12 km2.
Fieldwork carried out in 2022 failed to locate this species, but this
does not confirm its absence, and for the purposes of this assessment,
the localities from older records have been included. The threats
to this species include ongoing overgrazing by livestock, as well as
potential expansion of forestry plantations. Based on this, it has
been assessed as Endangered, under Critera B1 and B2.
Date last seen: 1975
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This species is known from two localities within Eswatini in the north west of the country, and one locality in Giant's Castle in South Africa. There is an additional record from Eswatini but without locality information, so this has been excluded from this assessment.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 12 | The estimated area of occupancy has been based on three localities for this species, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. |
| Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | It is unknown whether there has been a decline in area of occupancy. Fieldwork in 2022 failed to locate this species in the general areas of the previous collections within Eswatini, but its absence is not yet confirmed. |
| Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no information on extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy for this species. |
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 3462.102 | true | The estimated area of occupancy is based on the three recorded localities, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Inferred | More fieldwork is required to determine whether there is a continuing decline in the extent of occurrence for this species. |
| Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no information on any extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence. |
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 3 | This species has been recorded in two localities in Eswatini, and one in the Giants Castle area in South Africa. From this, it is estimated that there are three locations. |
| Continuing decline in number of locations | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | It has not yet been possible to confirm a decline in number of locations. Fieldwork to try to locate this species in 2022 was unsucessful, but does not confirm its absence. |
| Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no current information on any extreme fluctuations in the number of locations for this species. |
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Yes | This species has only been recorded in three locations, with an estimated area of occupancy of 12 km2. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 1390
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 1990
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
| South Africa -> KwaZulu-Natal | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
This species is currently known from two localities in Eswatini and one in Giant's Castle in South Africa. Fieldwork carried out in 2022 in Eswatini in the two recorded localities for this species failed to locate this plant, but this does not yet confirm its absence, so for the purposes of this assessment, it has been assumed that it still occurs in the localities noted on older records.
Current Population Trend: Unknown
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
This species is known from highveld grassland areas, vegetation types KaNgwane Montane Grassland (Gm16), Barberton Montane Grassland (Gm17) and Northern KwaZulu-Natal Moist Grassland (Gs4) (Mucina et. al. 2018).
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.7. Grassland -> Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude | - | Suitable | Yes |
| Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | There is ongoing pressure on the grassland habitats in the Eswatini highveld due to heavy grazing. |
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: Terrestrial
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
There is ongoing pressure on most of the highveld grassland areas by grazing. The locality for two of the records is in an area where there has been extensive mining activity as well as establishment of forestry plantations in the past. There is also the threat of habitat loss due to expansion of the forestry plantations or other forms of agriculture.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Wood & pulp plantations -> Agro-industry plantations | Unknown | Minority (<50%) | Very Rapid Declines |
| 2.3.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Livestock farming & ranching -> Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines |
The localities for this species in Eswatini do not fall within any formal protected area. The one record from South Africa is from within Giant's Castle National Park.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| Yes, over part of range | The one recorded location for this species in South Africa falls within Giant's Castle National Park. |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| Yes | The one recorded location for this species in South Africa falls within Giant's Castle National Park. |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 31-40 | One of three known localities for this species falls within a protected area. |
Area based regional management plan: (Not specified)
| Invasive species control or prevention | Note |
|---|---|
| Unknown | - |
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Land/water protection -> Resource & habitat protection | The highveld grassland areas are under pressure from ongoing heavy grazing. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | No material has yet been collected for ex-situ conservation of this species. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | More fieldwork is required to determine the population size, distribution and trends for this species. |
| 1.3. Research -> Life history & ecology | More information is required on the life history and ecology of this species for conservation planning purposes. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J and Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.