Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: Lotononis spicata Compton
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| EN - Endangered, B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: (Not specified)
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): (Not specified)
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Leobordea spicata has a very restricted distribution, with an estimated extent of occurrence of 815.601 km2 and an area of occupancy of 16 km2.
The majority of the population is under threat from overgrazing by
livestock resulting in ongoing habitat degradation. Based on this,
it has been assessed as Endangered, under Criteria B1 and B2.
Date last seen: 1994
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This species is known from four or five localities in the Eswatini highveld, the distribution extending from the Mankayane area in the south to the mountains near Maguga in the north. The elevation for these records is based on coordinates estimated from locality descriptions and might have a high degree of error, due to the mountainous topography of the area.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 16 | This species has been recorded in about four localities, information obtained from herbarium specimens, often without detailed locality information. The estimated area of occupancy was calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. |
| Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | - |
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO): (Not specified)
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 815.601 | true | The extent of occurrence has been based on localities estimated from the descriptions on herbarium specimen labels, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | - |
| Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | - |
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 4 | The number of locations has been estimated from the locality descriptions on herbarium specimen labels. |
| Continuing decline in number of locations | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | - |
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations: (Not specified)
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Yes | The area of occupancy for this species is 16 km2, based on information from five records. It is possible that this species is under-collected and might occur at other localities in the Eswatini highveld. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 790
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 1460
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
This species is known from five records, probably from four localities, within the Eswatini highveld. No population surveys have been carried out, and the most recent records for this species are from 1994.
Current Population Trend: Unknown
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
This species is known from four or five localities in the Eswatini highveld, in vegetation type KaNgwane Montane Grassland (Gm16) (Mucina et. al. 2018). The type specimen was recorded from a sandy stony plateau area, after fire.
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.7. Grassland -> Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude | Resident | Suitable | Yes |
| Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | There is ongoing heavy grazing through most of the highveld grassland in Eswatini. |
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: Terrestrial
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
This species is only known from the highveld grassland areas in Eswatini, and is under threat from ongoing heavy grazing.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Livestock farming & ranching -> Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines |
One of the four known localities for this species is within Malolotja Nature Reserve, in the Ngwenya Mountains.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| Yes, over part of range | One locality for this species is within Malolotja Nature Reserve. |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| Yes | This species has been found in the Ngwenya Mountains within Malolotja Nature Reserve. |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 21-30 | One out of four localities falls within a protected area. |
| Area based regional management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
Invasive species control or prevention: (Not specified)
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Land/water protection -> Resource & habitat protection | The establishment of more measures to conserve the highveld grassland areas within Eswatini would increase the potential for survival of this species. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | No material has yet been collected for ex-situ conservation of this species. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | Fieldwork is required to determine the population size, distribution and trends for this species. |
| 1.3. Research -> Life history & ecology | Information on this plant's life history and ecology is needed for planning of conservation actions. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J and Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.