Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: Lobelia delicatula Compton
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| VU - Vulnerable, B1ab(i,ii,iii)+2ab(i,ii,iii) (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: 2023-01-30
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): Braun, K.
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Lobelia trullifolia subsp. delicatula has a restricted distribution, with an estimated extent of occurrence of 1,365.476 km2 and area of occupancy of 28 km2.
All but one of the records for this subspecies have been found within a
small area in Eswatini. Threats to this species include ongoing
heavy grazing by livestock and uncontrolled burning. Based on
this, the subspecies has been assessed as Vulnerable, under Criteria B1
and B2.
Date last seen: 2022
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This subspecies is known from the Eswatini highveld and from one record in the Graskop area in South Africa.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 28 | The estimated area of occupancy is based on 9 records for this subspecies, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. |
| Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | This plant is known from highveld grassland areas, which are subjected to ongoing heavy grazing and burning. |
| Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no current information on extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy. |
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 1365.476 | true | The estimated extent of occurrence is based on 9 records for this subspecies, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | This plant is known from highveld grassland areas, which are subjected to ongoing heavy grazing and burning. |
| Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no current information on extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence. |
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 6 | Based on nine records for this subspecies, the number of locations is estimated at six. |
| Continuing decline in number of locations | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | More fieldwork is required to determine whether there has been any decline in number of locations for this plant. |
| Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no current information on any extreme fluctuations in the number of locations for this plant. |
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| No | This subspecies is estimated to have an area of occupancy of 28 km2. This might be an over-estimation as more fieldwork is required to determine whether the plant still exists at all the recorded locations. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 1040
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 1455
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
| South Africa -> Mpumalanga | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
At the time of assessment, there was no detailed population information available for this subspecies, more fieldwork is required to not only confirm its continued existence in some of the recorded localities but also to determine any trends. Based on the continued existence of the habitat, for the purposes of this assessment, it has been assumed that the plant still occurs in localities from older records.
Current Population Trend: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
This subspecies is known from rocky areas in highveld grassland, vegetation type KaNgwane Montane Grassland (Gm16) in Eswatini, and in Northern Escarpment Quartzite Sourveld Grassland (Gm23) in South Africa (Mucina et. al. 2018).
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.7. Grassland -> Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude | - | Suitable | Yes |
| Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | Most of the highveld grassland areas are subject to ongoing heavy grazing and burning. |
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: Terrestrial
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
The habitat for this subspecies is highveld grassland areas, most of which are subject to ongoing heavy grazing and burning.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Livestock farming & ranching -> Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines |
None of the known localities for this subspecies fall within a protected area.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 0 | - |
| Area based regional management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Invasive species control or prevention | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Land/water protection -> Resource & habitat protection | None of the known localities for this plant are currently within a protected area. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | No material has yet been collected for ex-situ conservation of this subspecies. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | There is a need for fieldwork to determine the ongoing existence of this plant in known localities as well as whether it occurs in other localities with similar habitat. |
| 1.3. Research -> Life history & ecology | More information is required on the life history and ecology of this plant for planning of conservation measures. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J and Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.