Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: No Synonyms
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| VU - Vulnerable, B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: 2023-01-28
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): Braun, K.
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Monopsis malvacea has a restricted distribution, with an estimated extent of occurrence of 4921.024 km2, and an area of occupancy of 44 km2.
There are ongoing threats to this species from overgrazing by
livestock, expansion of forestry plantations, and habitat degradation
due to invasive alien plants. Based on this, it has been assessed
as Vulnerable, under Criteria B1 and B2.
Date last seen: 2023
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This species is known from the Eswatini highveld, from the Hlatikhulu area in the south, extending to the Nkhaba area in the north. It has also been recorded from the Wakkerstroom area in South Africa.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 44 | The estimated area of occupancy is based on 15 records, some of which are from the same localities, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. |
| Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | There is currently no information with regard to a decline in area of occupancy. |
| Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There are no known extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy. |
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 4921.024 | true | The estimated extent of occurrence is based on 15 records, some of which are from the same localities, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | There is currently no information on decline in extent of occurrence. |
| Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is no current information on extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence. |
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 10 | The number of locations has been estimated as ten, based on 16 records, some of which are presumed to be from the same localities. |
| Continuing decline in number of locations | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | There is currently no information on decline in number of locations. |
| Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Unknown | There is currently no information on extreme fluctuations in the number of locations. |
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| No | The area of occupancy for this species is estimated at about 44 km2. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 1040
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 1575
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
| South Africa -> KwaZulu-Natal | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
No detailed population surveys have been conducted, but the plant's continued existence has been confirmed in 2022. It appears to have a very specific habitat requirement of east facing rocky areas within grassland, but where it is found, it can be locally abundant. For the purposes of this assessment, it has been assumed that the species still occurs at localities from older records, as the habitat still exists.
Current Population Trend: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
This species appears to have a very specific habitat requirement of east facing rocky areas within grassland, but more fieldwork is required to confirm this. The vegetation type where it has been recorded is primarily KaNgwane Montane Grassland (Gm16), with one record from Ithala Quartzite Sourveld (Gs2) and the South African record from Wakkerstroom Montane Grassland (Gm14) (Mucina et. al. 2018).
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.7. Grassland -> Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude | - | Suitable | Yes |
| Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | Although most of the Eswatini highveld grassland areas are subjected to heavy grazing and burning, the specific habitat requirements for this species, amongst rocky areas, provides some protection from both grazing and burning. There is a risk of habitat degradation due to spread of wattle (Acacia spp.) as well as forestry plantation expansion resulting in habitat loss. |
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: Terrestrial
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
The potential threats to this species are the ongoing heavy grazing and burning of the grassland areas, as well as encroachment of wattle (Acacia spp.). Currently however, there is no information on the extent of decline in available habitats. As this species has been recorded from within forestry plantation areas, planting up of grassland areas currently maintained as firebreaks could result in rapid habitat loss for this species.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Wood & pulp plantations -> Agro-industry plantations | Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Rapid Declines |
| 2.3.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Livestock farming & ranching -> Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines |
| 8.4.2. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> Problematic species/disease of unknown origin -> Named species | Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines |
| 8.4.2. Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases -> Problematic species/disease of unknown origin -> Named species | Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines |
This species is currently not known from within any protected areas.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 0 | - |
Area based regional management plan: (Not specified)
| Invasive species control or prevention | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Land/water protection -> Resource & habitat protection | Conservation of Eswatini highveld grassland areas would contribute to the ongoing survival of this species. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | No material has yet been collected for ex-situ conservation of this species. |
| 4.3. Education & awareness -> Awareness & communications | Providing information on this species to forestry plantation management could help ensure the survival of this plant. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | More fieldwork is required to determine the population size, distribution and trends. |
| 1.3. Research -> Life history & ecology | There is a need to investigate the detailed habitat information for this species, as it appears to have very specific requirements. This information would contribute to conservation planning for this plant. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J and Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.