Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: No Synonyms
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| EN - Endangered, B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: 2023-01-25
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): Braun, K.
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Orthosiphon vernalis has a very restricted distribution, with an estimated extent of occurrence of 68.454 km2 and an area of occupancy of 16 km2. Threats to the population include possible habitat loss where it occurs within the forestry plantation area, habitat loss due to expansion of agriculture and habitat degradation due to livestock grazing. Based on this, it has been assessed as Endangered, under Criteria B1 and B2.Date last seen: 2013
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This species has a very restricted distribution, it has been found in the Eswatini middleveld, from the Malkerns area to Bhunya. Locality information from older herbarium specimens does not include precise coordinates, so the extent of occurrence is a rough estimate.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 16 | The estimated area of occupancy has been based on the four recorded localities for this species, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. It is possible that at least one of these localites has been transformed by land use changes, and the area of occupancy might be less than 16 km2. |
| Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | The precise locality information is not available for some of the records, so it is not possible to definitively state that there has been habitat loss for this species. |
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO): (Not specified)
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 68.454 | true | The extent of occurrence has been estimated based on descriptions of localities from four locations, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). These are estimates, as precise locality information was not recorded on older herbarium specimen labels. |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | The precise locality information is not available for some of the records, so it is not possible to definitively state that there has been habitat loss for this species. |
Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO): (Not specified)
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 4 | It is possible that at least one of these locations has been subject to land use changes, and no longer has suitable habitat. |
| Continuing decline in number of locations | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | Lack of precise locality information makes it impossible to confirm whether habitat loss has occurred at the locality of the type specimen. |
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations: (Not specified)
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| Yes | This species is estimated to have an area of occupancy of 16 km2, and is known from 4 locations, one of which might no longer have suitable habitat. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 770
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 1090
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
No population surveys have been conducted for this species. The locality information for the early specimens is very approximate. For the purposes of this assessment, because of this uncertainty, it has been assumed that this species could still occur in those localities, in spite of extensive habitat transformation in the area. Old herbarium specimen label information indicates that this species was abundant at that locality.
Current Population Trend: Unknown
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
This species has been recorded from the Eswatini middleveld, in vegetation type Swaziland Sour Bushveld (SVI14) (Mucina et. al. 2018). The old herbarium specimen label information has the habitat for this species as tall farm veld, deep red clay loam soil.
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2. Savanna -> Savanna - Moist | - | Suitable | Yes |
| Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | The Malkerns area, at the eastern end of the population distribution, has been developed for agriculture, and is also expanding as an urban area. The western parts of the distribution fall within forestry plantation areas, so the habitat is limited to unplanted firebreaks within the plantation. The locality to the south of the distribution is subject to heavy grazing. |
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: Terrestrial
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
The distribution of this species falls within forestry plantation, intensive agriculture and rangeland areas. Within the forestry plantation, there is a risk of firebreaks being planted up. In the Malkerns area, the continued expansion of agriculture and urban development could threaten the habitat for this species. Heavy grazing might have had an impact on the habitat in the southern part of the distribution of this species.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1.3. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Annual & perennial non-timber crops -> Agro-industry farming | Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Rapid Declines |
| 2.2.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Wood & pulp plantations -> Agro-industry plantations | Unknown | Minority (<50%) | Rapid Declines |
| 2.3.2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> Livestock farming & ranching -> Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines |
This plant has not been found within any conservation areas.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 0 | - |
| Area based regional management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Invasive species control or prevention | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Land/water protection -> Resource & habitat protection | As none of the known distribution of this species falls within a protected area, it would be desirable to have at least part of this habitat protected. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | The collection of material for ex-situ conservation would enhance the potential survival of this species. |
| 4.3. Education & awareness -> Awareness & communications | For the areas of the distribution within the forestry plantation, it would be desirable to provide education and awareness training to forestry management, in order to avoid further habitat destruction which might affect this species. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | Fieldwork to determine the population size, distribution and trends for this species is needed in order to plan conservation measures. |
| 1.3. Research -> Life history & ecology | Very little is known of the life history and ecology of this species, such information would be necessary for conservation planning. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J, Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.