Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: No Synonyms
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| VU - Vulnerable, B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: 2023-01-29
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): Braun, K.
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Polystachya ngomensis has a restricted distribution, with an estimated extent of occurrence of 6,333,877 km2, and an area of occupancy of 24 km2.
There is an ongoing threat of habitat loss affecting some of its
population. Based on this, it has been assessed as Vulnerable,
under Criteria B1 and B2.
Date last seen: 2020
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
This species is known from near the Eswatini border in Mpumalanga, South Africa, extending south through the Eswatini highveld, to the Ngome area in KwaZulu Natal.
| Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2 | Justification |
|---|---|
| 24 | The estimated area of occupancy is based on 6 records for this species, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011), with the standard 2x2 km grid cell being applied. |
| Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | More fieldwork is required to determine whether this species is more widespread than is currently recorded, and whether there is any decline in known localities. |
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO): (Not specified)
| Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2 | EOO estimate calculated from Minimum Convex Polygon | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 6333.877 | - | The estimated extent of occurrence is based on 6 records for this species, calculated using GeoCAT (Bachman et al. 2011). |
| Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO) | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | - | More fieldwork is required to determine whether this species is more widespread than is currently recorded, and whether there is any decline in extent of occurrence. |
Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO): (Not specified)
| Number of Locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| 6 | The number of locations for this species is based on 6 records for this species. |
Continuing decline in number of locations: (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations: (Not specified)
| Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations | Justification |
|---|---|
| No | The currently known area of occupancy for this species is 24 km2, from 6 localities. |
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): 985
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): 1505
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: Afrotropical
| Country | Presence | Origin | Formerly Bred | Seasonality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eswatini | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
| South Africa -> KwaZulu-Natal | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
| South Africa -> Mpumalanga | Extant | Native | - | Resident |
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
No detailed population surveys have been conducted for this species, however at one locality in Mpumalanga, it was recorded as being prolific, with numerous seedlings present.
Current Population Trend: Unknown
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
This species is epiphytic on a variety of tree species, and in Eswatini, it has been found growing on Xerophyta retinervis. The vegetation types where this species has been found are grassland areas, including Barberton Montane Grassland (Gm17), KaNgwane Montane Grassland (Gm16), and Northern Zululand Mistbelt Grassland (Gs1) (Mucina et. al. 2018).
| Habitat | Season | Suitability | Major Importance? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.7. Grassland -> Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical High Altitude | - | Suitable | Yes |
| Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? | Qualifier | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Inferred | As this species is epiphytic, where it is not found on the Xerophyta,it is dependent on the presence of trees within the grassland areas, and there is ongoing habitat degradation of forested areas within the highveld grassland areas. |
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: (Not specified)
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: true
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
As this species is epiphytic, where it is not found on the Xerophyta,it is dependent on the presence of trees within the grassland areas, and there is ongoing habitat degradation of forested areas within the highveld grassland areas.
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.3.1. Biological resource use -> Logging & wood harvesting -> Intentional use: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines |
This species has currently not been recorded from within any protected areas.
| Action Recovery Plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Systematic monitoring scheme | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation sites identified | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Occur in at least one PA | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100) | Note |
|---|---|
| 0 | - |
| Area based regional management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Invasive species control or prevention | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Harvest management plan | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to ex-situ conservation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to recent education and awareness programmes | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Included in international legislation | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Subject to any international management/trade controls | Note |
|---|---|
| No | - |
| Conservation Actions | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Land/water protection -> Resource & habitat protection | There is a need for protection of the small forest patches within the highveld grassland in Eswatini. |
| 3.4.2. Species management -> Ex-situ conservation -> Genome resource bank | No material has yet been collected for ex-situ conservation of this species. |
| Research | Note |
|---|---|
| 1.2. Research -> Population size, distribution & trends | Fieldwork is required to determine whether this species is more widespread than is currently recorded within Eswatini. |
| Insufficient Information Available | All coded services should have an importance score of 5 - Not Known. |
|---|---|
| true | - |
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J and Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C. and Powrie, L.W. (Editors). 2018. The Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at: http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/186.