Draft
Common Names: No Common Names
Synonyms: No Synonyms
Taxonomic Note:
The distribution of Tephrosia brummittii shows a very
disjunct distribution, with one cluster of records in the Eswatini
highveld, and the remainder of the records occurring along the KwaZulu
Natal coast. It is therefore probable that they belong to
different taxa, and there is a need for a review of the taxonomy for
this species.
| Red List Status | |
|---|---|
| DD - Data Deficient, (IUCN version 3.1) |
Is the reassessment subject to the 5-year rule? (Not specified)
Date of Assessment: (Not specified)
Reviewed? (Not specified)
Assessor(s): (Not specified)
Reviewer(s): (Not specified)
Contributor(s): (Not specified)
Facilitators/Compilers: (Not specified)
Institution(s): (Not specified)
Acknowledgements: (Not specified)
Regions: Global
Regional Expert Questions: (Not specified)
Tephrosia brummittii was selected for assessment as a possible Eswatini near endemic. However, further research revealed a very disjunct distribution, with the Eswatini records in a cluster in the highveld/upper middleveld in the north west of the country, and all the South African records are restricted to the coast of KwaZulu Natal. It is therefore possible that these are taxonomically different. If these are different taxa, the population of the Eswatini form has an estimated extent of occurrence of 166.859 km2, and estimated area of occupancy of 24 km2. This would then be an Eswatini endemic and would require further assessment. This species has therefore been assessed as Data Deficient for reasons of taxonomic uncertainty.
Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: (Not specified)
Red List Index: (Not specified)
Geographic Range Information: (Not specified)
Estimated area of occupancy (AOO) - in km2: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in area of occupancy (AOO): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in area of occupancy (AOO): (Not specified)
Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO)- in km2: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in extent of occurrence (EOO): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence (EOO): (Not specified)
Number of Locations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of locations: (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of locations: (Not specified)
Very restricted in area of occupancy (AOO) and/or # of locations: (Not specified)
Elevation Lower Limit (in metres above sea level): (Not specified)
Elevation Upper Limit (in metres above sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Lower Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Upper Limit (in metres below sea level): (Not specified)
Depth Zone: (Not specified)
Map Status: (Not specified)
Biogeographic Realm: (Not specified)
Countries of Occurrence: (Not specified)
Large Marine Ecosystems: (Not specified)
FAO Marine Areas: (Not specified)
Population Information: (Not specified)
Current Population Trend: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals (=population size): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations? (in # of mature individuals): (Not specified)
Severely fragmented? (Not specified)
Continuing decline in mature individuals? (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 1 generation or 3 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 2 generations or 5 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Continuing decline % in mature individuals within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (up to max. of 100 years in the future): (Not specified)
Extreme fluctuations in the number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in number of subpopulations: (Not specified)
All individuals in one subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of mature individuals in largest subpopulation: (Not specified)
Number of Subpopulations: (Not specified)
Percent Change in past: (Not specified)
Past Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of past reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Percent Change in future: (Not specified)
Future Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Both: Percent Change over any 10 year or 3 generation period, whichever is longer, and must include both past and future, future can't go beyond 100 years: (Not specified)
Both Population Reduction Basis: (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction reversible? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction understood? (Not specified)
Causes of both (past and future) reduction ceased? (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 3 generations or 10 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 5 generations or 20 years, whichever is longer, maximum 100 years: (Not specified)
Probability of extinction in the wild within 100 years: (Not specified)
Habitats and ecology information: (Not specified)
General Habitat Information: (Not specified)
Continuing decline in area, extent and/or quality of habitat? (Not specified)
Generation Length: (Not specified)
Age at maturity: female or unspecified: (Not specified)
Age at Maturity: Male: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Female: (Not specified)
Size at Maturity (in cms): Male: (Not specified)
Longevity: (Not specified)
Average Reproductive Age: (Not specified)
Maximum Size (in cms): (Not specified)
Size at Birth (in cms): (Not specified)
Gestation Time: (Not specified)
Reproductive Periodicity: (Not specified)
Average Annual Fecundity or Litter Size: (Not specified)
Annual Rate of Population Increase: (Not specified)
Natural Mortality: (Not specified)
Does the species lay eggs? (Not specified)
Does the species give birth to live young: (Not specified)
Does the species exhibit parthenogenesis: (Not specified)
Does the species have a free-living larval stage? (Not specified)
Does the species require water for breeding? (Not specified)
Movement Patterns: (Not specified)
Congregatory: (Not specified)
System: (Not specified)
Wild relative of a crop? (Not specified)
Plant and Fungal Growth Forms: (Not specified)
Species not utilized: (Not specified)
No use/trade information for this species: (Not specified)
General notes regarding trade and use of this species: (Not specified)
Local Livelihood: (Not specified)
National Commercial Value: (Not specified)
International Commercial Value: (Not specified)
End Use: (Not specified)
Is there harvest from captive/cultivated sources of this species? (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from wild sources: (Not specified)
Trend in level of total offtake from domesticated sources: (Not specified)
Harvest Trend Comments: (Not specified)
Non-consumptive use of the species? (Not specified)
Explanation of non-consumptive use: (Not specified)
Livelihoods: (Not specified)
Threats Information: (Not specified)
No past, ongoing, or future threats exist to this species. (Not specified)
The threats to this species are unknown. (Not specified)
Threats: (Not specified)
Conservation Actions Information: (Not specified)
Action Recovery Plan: (Not specified)
Systematic monitoring scheme: (Not specified)
Conservation sites identified: (Not specified)
Occur in at least one PA: (Not specified)
Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100): (Not specified)
Area based regional management plan: (Not specified)
Invasive species control or prevention: (Not specified)
Harvest management plan: (Not specified)
Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly: (Not specified)
Subject to ex-situ conservation: (Not specified)
Subject to recent education and awareness programmes: (Not specified)
Included in international legislation: (Not specified)
Subject to any international management/trade controls: (Not specified)
Important Conservation Actions Needed: (Not specified)
Research Needed: (Not specified)
Insufficient Information Available: (Not specified)
Species provides no ecosystem services: (Not specified)
Ecosystem Services: (Not specified)
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J, Scott B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT geospatial conservation tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds) e-Infrastructure for data publishing in biodiversity science. . ZooKeys 150: 117-126.